The comparative analysis of the methods for keratin extraction from sheep wool and human hair

V. Havryliak¹, V. Mykhaliuk²

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

¹Lviv Polytechnic National University,
Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology,
3/4 St. Yura sq., Lviv, 79013, Ukraine

²Institute of Animal Biology,
38 V. Stus str., Lviv, 79034, Ukraine

Nowadays, biopolymers such as keratins are widely used in biomedicine due to their low toxicity, biocompatibility, and biodegradability. At the molecular level, keratins differ from other structural proteins by a high content of disulfide bonds, which provide the formation of a compact three-dimensional structure resistant to biological and chemical degradation. Native keratins are highly ordered, whereas, recovered keratins are characterized by a flexible structure with more accessible functional groups. A characteristic feature of solubilized keratins is their ability to polymerize; therefore, they are widely used to create biomaterials. The extraction of keratins from natural fibers is an important step to the development of functional biomaterials. However, this process is complicated by the presence of a large number of intramolecular and intermolecular disulfide bonds in keratins. That is why keratin extraction by breaking the intermolecular disulfide bonds while preserving the covalent bonds of the polypeptide chain is necessary. The goal of our study was to estimate the different methods of solubilized keratin obtaining. In the experiments, samples of different types of wool and human hair were used. Various methods of keratin extraction were applied. The yield of solubilized keratin (%) was calculated from the ratio of the weight of the lyophilized keratin extract and the initial weight of fibers. The molecular mass of recovered keratins was evaluated by SDS-PAAG electrophoresis in the Laemmli buffer system. An analysis of the efficiency of keratin extraction has shown that solubilized keratin yield ranged from 32% to 51% and depended on the composition of the extraction mixture. Electrophoretic analysis of all keratin extracts obtained by various methods confirmed the presence of two bands, which according to the molecular weight corresponding to I and II types of proteins of intermediate filaments. The presence of these proteins provides self-assembly into complex structures.

Key words: keratin, extraction, sheep wool, human hair

1. Ayutthaya SIN, Tanpichai S, Wootthikanokkhan J. Keratin extracted from chicken feather waste: extraction, preparation, and structural characterization of the keratin and keratin/biopolymer films and electrospuns. J. Polymer. Environ. 2015; 23: 506–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-015-0725-8
2. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Biochem. 1976; 72: 248–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
3. Cardamone J Investigating the microstructure of keratin extracted from wool: peptide sequence (MALDI-TOF/TOF) and protein conformation (FTIR). J. Mol. Structure. 2010; 969 (1–3): 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2010.01.048
4. Cheng Z, Chen X, Zhai D, Gao F, Guo T, Li W, Hao Sh, Ji J, Wang B. Development of keratin nanoparticles for controlled gastric mucoadhesion and drug release. Nanobiotech. 2018; 16, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-018-0353-2
5. Feroz S, Muhammad N, Ranayake J, Dias G. Keratin-Based materials for biomedical applications. Bioactive Materials. 2020; 5 (3): 496–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.04.007
6. Foglietta F, Spagnoli GC, Muraro MG, Ballestri M, Guerrini A, Ferroni C, Aluigi A, Sotgiu G, Varchi G. Anticancer activity of paclitaxel-loaded keratin nanoparticles in two-dimensional and perfused three-dimensional breast cancer models. J. Nanomed. 2018; 13: 4847–4867. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S159942
7. Grkovic M, Stojanovic DB, Kojovic A, Strnad S, Kreze T, Aleksic R, Uskokovic PS. Keratin-polyethylene oxide bio-nanocomposites reinforced with ultrasonically functionalized grapheme. RSC Adv. 2015; 5 (111): 91280–91287. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA12402F
8. Kamarudin NB, Sharma S, Gupta А, Kee CG, Chik SMSBT, Gupta R. Statistical investigation of extraction parameters of keratin from chicken feather using Design-Expert. 3 Biotech. 2017; 7: 127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-0767-9
9. Kim SY, Park BJ, Lee Y, Park NJ, Park KM, Hwang YS, Park Human hair keratin-based hydrogels as dynamic matrices for facilitating wound healing. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2019; 73: 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2019.01.017
10. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T₄. Nature. 1970; 227 (1): 680–685. https://doi.org/10.1038/227680a0
11. Li R, Wang D. Preparation of regenerated wool keratin films from wool keratin-ionic liquid solutions. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2013; 127 (4): 2648–2653. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.37527
12. Nakamura A, Arimoto M, Takeuchi K, Fujii T. A rapid extraction procedure of human hair proteins and identification of phosphorylated species. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2002; 25 (5): 569–572. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.25.569
13. Nakata R, Osumi Y, Miyagawa S, Tachibana A, Tanabe T. Preparation of keratin and chemically modified keratin hydrogels and their evaluation as cell substrate with drug releasing ability. Biosci. Bioeng. 2015; 120 (1): 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2014.12.005
14. Nayak KK, Gupta P. Study of the keratin-based therapeutic dermal patches for the delivery of bioactive molecules for wound treatment. Sci. Eng. C. 2017; 77: 1088–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.04.042
15. Robbins CR. Chemical and physical behavior of human hair. Berlin Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag. 2012: 724 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25611-0
16. Sierpinski P, Garrett J, Ma J, Apel P, Klorig D, Smith T, Koman LA, Atala A, Van Dyke The use of keratin biomaterials derived from human hair for the promotion of rapid regeneration of peripheral nerves. Biomaterials. 2008; 29 (1):118–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.08.023
17. Sinkiewicz I, Śliwińska A, Staroszczyk H, Kołodziejska I. Alternative methods of preparation of soluble keratin from chicken feathers. Waste Biomass. Valor. 2017; 8: 1043–1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9678-y
18. Tonin C, Aluigi A, Varesano A, Vineis C. Keratin-basednanofibers. In: Nanofibers. Ed. by Kumar A. InTech. 2010; 139–158. https://doi.org/10.5772/8151
19. Wan X, Wang Y, Jin X, Li P, Yuan J, Shen J. Heparinized PCL/keratin mats for vascular tissue engineering scaffold with potential of catalytic nitric oxide generation. Biomater. Sci. Polym. 2018; 29 (14): 1785–1798. https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2018.1504192
20. Wong SY, Lee CC, Ashrafzadeh A, Junit SM, Abrahim N, Hashim OH. A high-yield two-hourprotocol for extraction of human hair shaft proteins. PLoS ONE. 2016; 11: 10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164993