Bìol. Tvarin, 2018, volume 20, issue 4, pp. 20–25


VVDzitsiuk1, HTTіpіlo1, Yu.V.Huzeyev2

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

1Institute of Animal Breeding and Genetics named after M. V. Zubets NAAS,
1 Pogrebnjaka str., Chubynske village, Boryspil district, Kyiv region, 08321, Ukraine

2“Golosiyevo” Ltd.,
Gogoliv village, Brovarskyi district, Kyiv region, 07452, Ukraine

In the article the results of researches of “number of nucleolus organizer regions (NOR) in the chromosomes” in river buffalos (Bubalus of bubalis L) are expounded. In NOR of the chromosomes there is ribosomal RNA (rRNA) associated with argentophilic nucleus proteins, which provide protein synthesis in somatic cells and affect the processes of growth and development of the organism of animals and humans. The intensity of dyeing areas of nucleolar organizers reflects the potentialities of the functional state of cells in farm animals. The number, size and chromosomal localization of silver-colored areas of the organizers of the nucleolus are species-specific features.

NORs have been studied on preparations of chromosomes, which were prepared according to the standard method of peripheral blood lymphocytes of 10 adult animals kept on the farm of the “Svyato-Pokrovska Holosiyivska Pustyn” monastery — Golosiyevo Ltd. (Gogoliv village, Brovarsky district, Kyiv region). Coloring of chromosomal preparations in order to detect areas of nucleolar organizers was carried out in 50 % solution of silver nitrate according to the recommendations of the Committee for Standardized Karyotype of Bubalus bubalis, 1994. The NORs were detected on the telomere of the corresponding chromosomes as dark spots.

As a result of the research, active regions of the nucleolar organizers in six chromosomes of the karyotype of the investigated buffaloes — 3, 4, 6, 21, 23, 24 — were established. The individual variability of the animals was determined by the number of NORs: in the metaphase plates it was found from 1 to 12 per cell, with an average number 2.82 in 207 cells. The largest part is the proportion of metaphase plates with two NORs (93 out of 208), more than half the proportion of metaphases with three NORs, 12 % with one and four NORs. It has been shown that the Ag-method of dyeing can be successfully applied in animal cytogenetic studies as a method for evaluating the functioning of rRNA genes and metabolic activity of an organism, for the rapid identification of chromosomal aberrations, in particular translocations involving chromosomes with NO-regions. It is promising to study the NOR polymorphism in farm animals at the molecular level and to compare it with the indicators of their productivity.


  1. Babu K. A., Verma R. S. Structural and Functional Aspects of Nucleolar Organizer Regions (NORs) of Human Chromosomes. International Review of Cytology, 1985, vol. 94, pp. 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7696(08)60396-4
  2. Berardino D. D., Arrighi F. E. Kieffer N. M. Nucleolus organizer regions in two species of Bovidae. Journal of Heredity, 1979, vol. 70, issue 1, pp. 47–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a109187
  3. Berardino D., Lioi M. B., Iannuzzi L. Identification of Nucleolus Organizer Chromosomes in Cattle (Bos Taurus L.) by Sequential Silver Staining + Rba Banding. Caryologia International Journal of Cytology, Cytosystematics and Cytogenetics, 1985, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.1985.10797734
  4. Buchinskaya L. G, Polishchuk L. Z. The regions of the nucleolar organizer in endometrial cells with glandular hyperplasia and cancer. Experimental Oncology, 2001, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 157–160. (in Russian)
  5. Dubrova A. N. Nucleolus organizers of chromosomes as an adaptive element of the species Zhurn. total biol., 1989, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 213–217. (in Russian)
  6. Grafodatsky A. S. Comparative cytogenetics of three canine species (carnivora, canidae). Messaging III: Distribution of nucleus-forming regions. Genetics, 1983, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 778–783.
  7. Henderson L. M., Bruère A. N. Conservation of nucleolus organizer regions during evolution in sheep, goat, cattle and aoudad. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology, 1979, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1139/g79-001
  8. Iannuzzi L. (coordinator). Standard Karyotype of the river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis L., 2n=50). Report of the committee for the standardization of banded karyotypes of the river buffalo. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics, 1994., vol. 67, issue 2, pp. 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1159/000133808
  9. Iannuzzi L., Di Meo G. P. Chromosomal evolution in bovids: a comparison of cattle, sheep and goat G- and R-banded chromosomes and cytogenetic divergences among cattle, goat and river buffalo sex chromosomes. Chromosome Research, 1995, vol. 3, issue 5, pp. 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00713067
  10. Iannuzzi L., Di Meo G. P., Perucatti A. Identification of nucleolus organizer chromosomes and frequency of active NORs in river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis L.). Caryologia. International Journal of Cytology, Cytosystematics and Cytogenetics, 1996, vol. 49, issue 1, pp. 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.1996.10797347
  11. Kiseleva T. Yu., Yakovlev A. F., Smirnov A. F. On the polymorphism of the activity of the regions of the nucleolar organizer of chromosomes in various cattle breeds. Agricultural Biology, 1985, no. 4, pp. 100–107. (in Russian)
  12. Klenovitsky P. M., Iolchiev B. S., Zhilinsky M. A., Bagirov V. A., Onkorova N. T., Grishin V. N. Analysis of nucleoli in intact lymphocytes of peripheral blood of various mammalian species. Achievements of science and technology of the APK, 2015, no. 12, pp. 92–94. (in Russian)
  13. Liapunova N. A., Kravets-Mandron I. A., Tsvetkova T. G., Cytogenetic of nucleolar organizer regions (NOR) of human chromosomes: identification of four morphofunctional variants of NOR, their inter-individual and inter-chromosomal distribution. Genetica, 1998, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 1298–1306.
  14. Loginov S. I., Semenova O. N., Ilyushina N. I. Quantitative analysis of nucleolar-forming regions of chromosomes in cattle in normal and pathological conditions. Siberian messenger of agricultural sciences, 2004, no. 3. pp. 103–106. (in Russian)
  15. Mellink C. H. M., Bosma A. A., De Haan N. A., Macdonald A. A. Numerical variation of nucleolus organizer regions after silver staining in domestic and wild Suidae (Mammalia). Animal Genetics, 1994, vol. 23, issue 3, pp. 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.1992.tb00135.x
  16. Morton C. C., Brown J. A., Holmes W. A., Nance W. E., Wolf B. Stain intensity of human nucleolus organizer region reflects incorporation of uridine in to mature ribosomal RNA. Experimental Cell Research, 1983, vol. 145, issue 2, pp. 405413. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(83)90019-8
  17. Orlov V. N., Bulatova N. Sh. Comparative cytogenetics and cariosystematics of mammals. Moscow, Nauka, 1983, 406 p. (in Russian)
  18. Pathak S., Kieffer N. M. Sterility in hybrid cattle. Cytogenetic and Genome Research, 1979, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1159/000131355
  19. Proskuryakova A. A., Kulemzina A. I., Perelman P. L., SerdukovaN. A., Ryder O. A, Graphodatsky A. S. The Case of X and Y Localization of Nucleolus Organizer Regions (NORs) in Tragulus javanicus (Cetartiodactyla, Mammalia). Genes (Basel), 2018, vol. 9, issue 6, p. E312. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9060312
  20. Stefanova V. N. Quantitative characterization of the nucleolus-forming regions of pig chromosomes. Bul. VNIIRGZH, L-Pushkin, 1983, vol. 67, pp. 6–10. (in Russian)
  21. Stent G., Kalider R. Molecular genetics. Moscow, Mir, 1986, 415 p.
  22. Yakovlev A. F. Cytogenetic evaluation of breeding animals. Moscow, Agropromizdat, 1985, 256 p. (in Russian)
  23. Zhidenova A. N., Kochneva M. L., Kulikova S. G. Environmental aspects of the study of polymorphism of the nucleolus-forming regions of chromosomes in cattle. Strategy for the development of zootechnical science: mes. report International scientific-practical conf., dedicated. 60th anniversary of livestock. Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, 2009, pp. 55–56. (in Russian)

Download full text in PDF