Bìol. Tvarin, 2019, volume 21, issue 2, pp. 73–76


L. Vranković1, J. Aladrović1, I. Pipal2, B. Beer Ljubić3, N. Prvanović Babić4, Z. Stojević1

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

1University of Zagreb, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Physiology and Radiobiology,
Heinzelova ul., 55, Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
2Veterinary clinic VETMED d.o.o., 
Gornje Selo 59, Stružec, Popovača, 44317, Croatia
3University of Zagreb, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Internal Diseases Clinic, 
Heinzelova ul., 55, Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
4University of Zagreb, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Reproduction and Obstetrics Clinic,
Heinzelova ul., 55, Zagreb, 10000, Croatia

The aim of our study was to determine indexes of insulin resistance (IR) in early postpartum period in cows and their calves kept in a beef suckler system. The study was conducted on 13 Simmental cows and their calves. We calculated following indexes values: RQUICKI (Revised Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index) and its modified version RQUICKIBHB, HOMA (Homeostatic Model Assessment) and QUICKI (Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index) based on serum concentrations of glucose, insulin, NEFA (non esterified fatty acids) and BHB (β-hydroxybutyrate), sampled 6, 12 and 48h and 7 and 14 d pp. Cows were grouped according to lactation number (2nd to 4th lactation, 1st group; and 5th to 8th lactation, 2nd group) and calves according to gender.

Results showed that RQUICKI was higher in 1st group of cows (P>0.05) and showed progressive increase during pp period in both groups. In 1st group of cows RQUICKI was lower 6 and 12 h pp than 14 d p.p. (P=0.01). HOMA was higher in 2nd group of cows (P>0.05); HOMA was higher 12 h pp than 48 h, 7 and 14 d p.p. (P=0.01) as well as 6 h pp than 7 and 14 d p.p. (P=0.01). QUICKI showed the same trend in both groups, progressive decrease from 6h to 14 d p.p. (P=0.001, 1st group; P=0.001, 2nd group). In calves, HOMA was higher in females (P>0.05). In females HOMA was lower 6 h pp than 7 and 14 d p.p. (P=0.03). RQUICKIBHB was higher in females than in males (P=0.03). RQUICKIBHB showed progressive decline from 6 h p.p. to 14 d p.p. in females (P=0.004). Changes in trends of IR indexes may help in analysis of decreased sensitivity or responsiveness to the metabolic actions of insulin as well as in determination of metabolic status of animals.


  1. Bell A.W. Regulation of organic nutrient metabolism during transition from late pregnancy to early lactation. Journal of Animal Science, 1995, vol. 73, issue 9, pp. 2804–2819. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.7392804x
  2. Bossaert P., Leroy J. L. M. R., De Campeneere S., De Vliegher S., Opsomer G. Differences in the glucose-induced insulin response and the peripheral insulin responsiveness between neonatal calves of the Belgian Blue, Holstein-Friesian, and East Flemish breeds. Journal of Diary Science, 2009, vol. 92, issue 9, pp. 4404–4411. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2218
  3. Cincović M., Kirovski D., Vujanac I., Belić B., Djoković R. Relationship between the indexes of insulin resistance and metabolic status in dairy cows during early lactation. Acta Veterinaria-Beograd, 2017, vol. 67, issue 1, pp. 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1515/acve-2017-0006
  4. De Koster J., Hostens M., Hermans K., Van den Broeck W., Opsomer G. Validation of different measures of insulin sensitivity of glucose metabolism in dairy cows using the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp test as the gold standard. Domestic Animal Endocrinology, 2016, vol. 57, pp. 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.domaniend.2016.06.004
  5. Haarstrich D. Evaluation of surrogate indices of insulin sensitivity by means of hyperinsulinemiceuglycemic glucose clamps in dairy cows. In: Insulinsensitivität und Insulinresponse nach einer Langzeit-Supplementation von konjugierten Linolsäuren bei laktierenden Milchkühen. Inaugural disertation. Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover, 2011.
  6. Holtenius P., Holtenius K. A model to estimate insulin sensitivity in dairy cows. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 2007, vol. 49, p. 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-49-29
  7. Hostettler-Allen R. L., Tappy L., Blum J. W. Insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, and glucosuria in intensively milk-fed calves. Journal of Animal Science, 1994, vol. 72, issue 1, pp. 160–173. https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.721160x
  8. Hugi D., Bruckmaier R. M., Blum J. W. Insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, glucosuria, and galactosuria in intensively milk-fed calves: Dependency on age and effects of high lactose intake. Journal of Animal Science, 1997, vol. 75, issue 2, pp. 469–482. https://doi.org/10.2527/1997.752469x
  9. Kahn C. R. Insulin resistance, insulin insensitivity, and insulin unresponsiveness: a necessary distinction. Metabolism — Clinical and Experimental, 1978, vol. 27, issue 12, suppl. 2, pp. 1893–1902. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0026-0495(78)80007-9
  10. Kerestes M., Faigl V., Kulcsár A., Balogh O., Földi J., Fébel H., Chilliard Y., Huszenicza G. Periparturient insulin secretion and whole-body insulin responsiveness in dairy cows showing various forms of ketone pattern with or without puerperal metritis. Domesic Animal Endocrinology, 2009, vol. 37, issue 4, pp. 250–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.domaniend.2009.07.003
  11. Muniyappa R., Lee S., Chen H., Quon M. J. Current approaches for assessing insulin sensitivity and resistance in vivo: advantages, limitations, and appropriate usage. American Journal of Physiology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2008, vol. 294, issue 1, pp. E15–E26. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00645.2007
  12. Opsomer G., Wensing T., Laevens H., Coryn M., Kruif de A. Insulin resistance: the link between metabolic disorders and cystic ovarian disease in high yielding dairy cows? Animal Reproduction Science, 1999, vol. 56, issue 3–4, pp. 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(99)00048-2
  13. Perseghin G., Caumo A., Caloni M., Testolin G., Luzi L. Incorporation of the fasting plasma FFA concentration into QUICKI improves its association with insulin sensitivity in nonobese individuals. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2001, vol. 86, issue 10, pp. 4776–4781. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.86.10.7902

Download full text in PDF