Bìol. Tvarin. 2022; 24 (1): 25–33.
Received 06.08.2021 ▪ Accepted 25.11.2021 ▪ Published online 01.04.2022

Feed protein solubility as an indicator of digestibility and availability of nutrients in the diets of bulls

V. S. Kozyr, V. I. Petrenko, G. G. Dimchya, A. N. Maistrenko

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

State Institution Institute of Grain Crops NAAS,
14 Volodymyr Vernadskyi str., Dnipro, 49027, Ukraine

The research was conducted on steppe red bulls with duodenal and ileocecal anastomoses when feeding isoenergetic, isoprotein hay-concentrate diets with different levels of soluble protein (SP) and rumen degradable protein (RDP). We studied the transformation of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP), crude ash (CA), crude fat (CF), crude fiber (CF) and nitrogen-free extractives (NFE) separately in a complex stomach, small (SI) and large (LI) parts of the intestine. Assimilation of protein by animals was assessed by the amount of it digested in SI, and unproductive costs — by the part of nitrogen in the urine. Diets consisted of hay, peas and mineral supplements. Different amounts of SP in the diets were achieved by feeding natural pea (control) or pea grilled at a temperature of +105°C (experiment). When feeding a diet with a reduced level of SP and RDP, the apparent intensity of digestion decreased, which was manifested in a slightly smaller amount of feed consumed, and in a smaller number of duodenal and ileocecal chyme. In a complex stomach, the CP digestibility of the experimental diet with a reduced level of SP was 10% lower. In the control diet with a high level of SP, more CP was degraded in rumen and more ammonium nitrogen was supplied to SI. The availability of CP for digestion in SI on the experimental diet was 5.8% higher, against control, with 8–10% higher digestibility of DM, OM and CP, but lower digestibility of CA and CF. In LI, the digestibility of nutrients in the studied diets was multidirectional. A significant amount of dietary protein was depreciated in the control diet with a high level of SP due to a 40% increase in urinary nitrogen excretion.

Key words: organic matter, protein, solubility, fat, fiber, nitrogen-free extractives, digestibility, complex stomach, small intestine, large intestine

  1. Bateman HG, Clark JH, Murphy MR. Development of a system to predict feed protein flow to the small intestine of cattle. Dairy Sci. 2005; 88 (1): 282–295. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72686-2.
  2. Bohdanov HO, Kandyba VM (eds.). Norms and rations of complete feeding of high-yielding cattle: a handbook. Kyiv, Agrarian Science, 2012: 296 p. (in Ukrainian)
  3. Bohdanov HO, Rudenko EV (eds.). Information database of chemical composition of feed in Ukraine for the organization of feeding of farm animals. Kharkiv, the Institute of Animal Husbandry UAAS, 2009: 216 p. (in Ukrainian)
  4. Conway EJ. Microdiffusion Analysis and Volumetric Error. 4th London, Crosly Lockwood, 1957: 162–174.
  5. Cyupko VV, Pronina VV, Vasilevskij NV, Zlobina GS, Berus MV, Mukhin SM, Rosso LN, Bublik VN, Osenev AV, Soloveva TL, Kutikov ES, Yugaj KD, Antipin SL. Normalized feeding for cattle of dairy and combined direction of productivity: guidelines. Kharkiv, Institute of Animal Husbandry UAAS, 1995: 77 p.
  6. Daniel JB, Van Laar H, Dijkstra J, Sauvant D. Evaluation of predicted ration nutritional values by NRC (2001) and INRA (2018) feed evaluation systems, and implications for the prediction of milk response. Dairy Sci. 2020; 103 (12): 11268–11284. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2020-18286.
  7. Ibatullin II, Zhukorskyi OM (eds.). Handbook of complete feeding of farm animals. 2016: 300 p. (in Ukrainian)
  8. Kandyba VM, Ibatullin II, Kostenko VI (eds.). Theory and practice of normalized feeding of cattle: a monograph. Zhytomyr, 2012: 860 p. (in Ukrainian)
  9. Kaplan VA, Sviridenko VA. Methods for determination of urea in blood plasma, milk and urine. Methods of research in animal husbandry. Sci. Conf.NII Zh LiP USSR. Kharkiv, 1966: 104–108.
  10. Lapierre H, Larsen M, Sauvant D, Van Amburgh ME, Van Duinkerken G. Review: Converting nutritional knowledge into feeding practices. A case study comparing different protein feeding systems for dairy cows. 2018; 12 (s2): s457–s466. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731118001763.
  11. Mejlus PI. Changes in some indicators of metabolism in the rumen, physiological condition and productivity of cows when they are fed urea in different ways. Aut. ref. dis. cand. biol. sci. Kaunas, 1964.
  12. Moshtaghi Nia SA, Ingalls JR. Effect of moist heat treatment on canola meal nitrogen degradation in the rumen and absorption in the small and intestines of steers using a mobile nylon bag technique. 86th Meet. Amer. Dairy Sci. Assoc. (ADSA), Logan, Utah. J. Dairy Sci. 1991; 74 (1): 180.
  13. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th rev. ed. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC. 2001.
  14. Petrenko VI, Petrenko MT. The use of protein depending on its solubility. Message 2. Influence of protein solubility on its digestion and productivity of cattle. Tech. Bull. Inst. Anim. Husb. UAAS. Kharkiv, 2000; 77: 83–86. (in Ukrainian)
  15. Sauvant D, Nozière P. Quantification of the main digestive processes in ruminants: the equations involved in the renewed energy and protein feed evaluation systems. Animal. 2016; 10 (5): 755–770. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731115002670.
  16. Shapovalov SO, Dolhaia MM, Rudenko YV, Varchuk SS. Estimation of biological value of proteins in animal feed. Kyiv, Agrarian Science, 2016: 92 p. (in Ukrainian)
  17. Sviridenko VA, Kaplan VA. Estimation of digestibility of feed nitrogen by ruminants on the share of urea nitrogen in total urine nitrogen. Method. issl. in alive. Sci. Conf. NII Zh LiP USSR. Kharkiv, 1966: 108–111.
  18. Van Duinkerken G, Blok MC, Bannink A, Cone JW, Dijkstra J, van Vuuren AM, Tamminga S. Update of the Dutch protein evaluation system for ruminants: The DVE/OEB2010 J. Agric. Sci. 2011; 149 (3): 351–367. DOI: 10.1017/S0021859610000912.
  19. Vasilevskiy NV, Berus MV, Zlobina GS, Tsyupko VV. A new way to assess the influence of the quantity and quality of crude feed protein on its digestion in the gastrointestinal tract of bulls. New Zootech. Res. Method. Mat. Conf. Kharkiv, 1992; 2: 26–30.
  20. Verite R, Journet M, Jarrige R. A new system for the protein feeding of ruminants: the PDI system. Livestock Prod. Sci. 1979; 6 (4): 349–367. DOI: 10.1016/0301-6226(79)90003-4.
  21. Zlobina GS, Berus MV, Vasilevskiy NV, Bublik VN, Tsyupko VV. Methods for evaluating crude feed protein for digestion in the small intestine and protein rationing system for cattle. New Zootech. Res. Method. Mat. conf. 1992; 2: 8–13.
  22. Zverev AI, Kharchenko AG. Solubility of feed protein is a factor in its rational use in feeding dairy cows. Dairy Meat Cattle breed. 1990; 77: 54–58.