Download full text in PDF

Stapay PV, Buslyk TV, Mykhaliuk VV, Stakhiv NP, Smolyaninova OO, Nevostruyeva IV, Sachko RG, Skorokhid АV, Pakholkiv NI. The ratio
of structural proteins in the wool of sheep of different breeds and with different categories of fibers depending on the zones of their breeding. Bìol Tvarin. 2024; 26 (1): 24–28.
https://doi.org/10.15407/animbiol26.01.024
Received 24.11.2023 ▪ Revision 01.03.2024 ▪ Accepted 13.03.2024 ▪ Published online 29.03.2024


The ratio of structural proteins in the wool of sheep of different breeds and with different categories of fibers depending on the zones of their breeding

P. V. Stapay, T. V. Buslyk, V. V. Mykhaliuk, N. P. Stakhiv, O. O. Smolyaninova, I. V. Nevostruyeva, R. G. Sachko, А. V. Skorokhid, N. I. Pakholkiv

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Institute of Animal Biology NAAS, 38 V. Stus str., Lviv, 79034, Ukraine


Wool fiber consists of a complex of protein-keratins, which differ in both their physical and chemical properties and functional characteristics. Despite the progress achieved in the study of the structural organization of fibers, the issue of the influence of environmental factors, the nature and level of nutrition, as well as breed characteristics, remains poorly understood. With this in mind, we investigated the ratio of structural proteins in the wool of sheep of different breeds, which are bred in separate zones of Ukraine, in particular, fine-wool, semi-fine-wool, and coarse-wool. Therefore, during the study of the structural proteins of the wool of sheep of different breeds, which differ among themselves in the thinness of the fibers, it was established that by the method of electrophoretic separation, these proteins are clearly divided into three different groups, in particular, these are proteins of intermediate filaments (IF) of I and II types with a molecular weight of 55–65 and 45–55 kDa, respectively, as well as keratin-associated proteins (KAP) with a molecular weight of 25–35 kDa. However, in some breeds, in particular, the Askanian meat-wool of the black-headed type and the Ukrainian Mountain Carpathian type, two more fractions of proteins were found among IF type I, which almost do not differ from each other in terms of percentage. It was established that within the studied groups of sheep, certain interbreed features are observed, so in the group of thin-wooled breeds, the largest percentage falls on IF II (35.9%). The other two factions account for almost the same percentage — 32.1% (IF I) and 31.8% (KAP). An almost similar picture of the ratio of protein fractions was recorded in the group of animals with coarse wool. At the same time, in the group of sheep with semi-fine wool, in particular, the fibers of sheep of the Ascanian meat-wool breed have the highest percentage of KAP and, accordingly, less IF II, and in the fibers of the Ascanian meat-wool black-headed type, respectively, less proteins of IF II and KAP. Therefore, the obtained data clearly indicate breed characteristics of the content and ratios of certain groups of proteins, which can be genetically determined, and therefore serve as appropriate markers both within individual breeds and within breeds with different fiber categories.

Key words: sheep, breed, wool, structure, proteins, Sulfur, electrophoresis


  1. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dyebinding. Analyt Biochem. 1976; 72 (1–2): 248–254. DOI: 10.1006/abio.1976.9999.
  2. Coderch L, Oliver MA, Carrer V, Manich AM, Martí M. External lipid function in ethnic hairs. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019; 18 (6): 1912–1920. DOI: 10.1111/jocd.12899.
  3. Coderch L, Oliver MA, Martínez V, Manich AM, Rubio L, Martí M. Exogenous and endogenous lipids of human hair. Skin Res Technol. 2017; 23 (4): 479–485. DOI: 10.1111/srt.12359.
  4. Conway JF, Parry DA. Structural features in the heptad substructure and longer range repeats of two-stranded α-fibrous proteins. Intern J Biol Macromol. 1990; 12 (5): 328–334. DOI: 10.1016/0141-8130(90)90023-4.
  5. Havryliak VV, Mykhaliuk VV. The factors impacting the efficiency of the extraction of keratin wool fibers. Visnyk Lviv Univer Biol Ser. 2016; 73: 47–50. Available at: http://publications.lnu.edu.ua/bulletins/index.php/biology/article/view/7819 (in Ukrainian)
  6. Isarankura Na Ayutthaya S, Tanpichai S, Wootthikanokkhan J. Keratin extracted from chicken feather waste: extraction, preparation, and structural characterization of the keratin and keratin/biopolymer films and electrospuns. J Polymer Environ. 2015; 23 (4): 506–516. DOI: 10.1007/s10924-015-0725-8.
  7. Kakkar P, Madhan B, Shanmugam G. Extraction and characterization of keratin from bovine hoof: A potential material for biomedical applications. SpringerPlus. 2014; 3 (1): 596. DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-596.
  8. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. 1970; 227: 680–685. DOI: 10.1038/227680a0.
  9. Mykhaliuk VV, Buslyk TV, Stapay PV, Smolyaninova OO, Stakhiv NP, Nevostruyeva IV, Sachko RG. Electrophoretic analysis of sheep wool proteins. Guidelines. Lviv, Institute of Animal Biology NAAS, 2024: 17 p. (in Ukrainian)
  10. Naito S, Arai K. Type and location of SS linkages in human hair and their relation to fiber properties in water. J Appl Polymer Sci. 1996; 61 (12): 2113–2118. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19960919)61:12<2113::AID-APP9>3.0.CO;2-D.
  11. Nakamura A, Arimoto M, Takeuchi K, Fujii T. A rapid extraction procedure of human hair proteins and identification of phosphorylated species. Biol Pharmac Bull. 2002; 25 (5): 569–572. DOI: 10.1248/bpb.25.569.
  12. Posati T, Giuri D, Nocchetti M, Sagnella A, Gariboldi M, Ferroni C, Aluigi A. Keratin-hydrotalcites hybrid films for drug delivery applications. Eur Polymer J. 2018; 105: 177–185. DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.05.030.
  13. Saha S, Arshad M, Zubair M, Ullah A. Keratin as a Biopolymer. In: Keratin as a Protein Biopolymer. Springer, Cham, 2019: 163–185. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-02901-2_6.
  14. Tkachuk VM, Havrylyak VV, Stapay PV, Sedilo HM. Comparative characteristics of internal lipids in wool fibres of different types. Bìol Tvarin. 2013; 15 (2): 131–139. DOI: 10.15407/animbiol15.02.131.
  15. Tkachuk VM, Havrylyak VV, Stapay PV, Sedilo HM. Internal lipids of felted, yellowed and pathologically thin wool. Ukr Biochem J. 2014; 86 (1): 131–138. DOI: 10.15407/ubj86.01.131.
  16. Zahn H, Wortmann F. Chemistry and structure of wool. Chem Our Time. 1997; 31 (6): 280–290. DOI: 10.1002/ciuz.19970310604.
  17. Zahn H, Wortmann FJ, Wortmann G. Wool. Weinheim, Wiley — VCH Verlag Gmbh & Co.KGaA, 2005: 31 p.

Search