Download full text in PDF

Gill M, Posukhin V, Tymofiiv M. Organisation of dairy cattle herd reproduction. Bìol. Tvarin. 2024; 26 (4): 18–32. DOI: 10.15407/animbiol26.04.018.
https://doi.org/10.15407/animbiol26.04.018
Received 09.08.2024 ▪ Revision 01.10.2024 ▪ Accepted 20.01.2025 ▪ Published online 22.01.2025

---

Organisation of dairy cattle herd reproduction

M. Gill, V. Posukhin, M. Tymofiiv

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Mykolaiv National Agrarian University, 9 Georgiy Gongadze str., Mykolaiv, 54008, Ukraine

---

A fairly high hereditary potential of cows of modern Ukrainian breeds in terms of the main traits of milk production is discussed. It was found that higher milk yield, content and amount of fat in milk are inherent in cows of the Ukrainian Black Speckled Dairy breed, which in the context of the four evaluated lactations were better, except for the third (where no clear leader was found for the main traits). In modern high-yielding herds of Ukrainian cattle, the duration of lactation, regardless of the genotype with or without Holstein bloodlines, exceeds the optimal value (305 days), which is associated with later insemination of cows after calving and an extended service period. Therefore, when assessing the efficiency of dairy cows, it is advisable to take into account the number of milk days and adjust their milk production and reproductive capacity accordingly. And the effect of Holsteinisation on the lengthening of the lactation period occurs only in the herd of the Ukrainian Black Speckled Dairy breed. The milk yield reflex of the cows of the studied breeds is within the limits of the accepted optimal indicators, which indicates their good adaptability and adaptation to the technology of machine milking, and the live weight of animals of the three studied breeds at the end of the growing period is within the breed standards. However, it is higher in the Red and Black Speckled Dairy breeds, which indicates their better ability to high growth intensity under appropriate growing conditions and, as previous studies have shown, to better milk production. The degree of development of the main body structure measurements of cows is within the standards and corresponds to the norms of the dairy cow type, and no clear advantage in favour of a certain group of cows was found for the main measurements. The height at the withers, depth and width of the chest are better developed in Ukrainian Black Speckled Dairy cattle, and the oblique length of the body and the girth of the metacarpal — in the Ukrainian Red Dairy breed, with a larger girth of the chest in the Ukrainian Red Speckled Dairy breed. The analysis of the reproductive function of cows gives grounds to assert that among all the studied breeds there is a significant deterioration, which leads, regardless of breed affiliation, to an increase in the duration of service period (128–132 days) and the period between calvings (406–423 days), and this negatively affects the calf yield per year and, as a result, significantly increases the insemination index (6.40–6.59). The analysis of correlations between the main selection traits of mothers and their daughters established high predictions for their inheritance (0.48–1.06), which will significantly increase the efficiency of selection for milk yield and milk fat in these herds of modern breeds.

Key words: reproductive function, sexual desire, service period, insemination index, dry period, artificial insemination, milk production, breed

---

1. Abdollahi-Arpanahi R, Carvalho MR, Ribeiro ES, Peñagaricano F. Association of lipid-related genes implicated in conceptus elongation with female fertility traits in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2019; 102 (11): 10020–10029. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2019-17068.
2. Al-Sharif M, Radwan H, Hendam B, Ateya A. DNA polymorphisms of FGFBP1, leptin, κ-casein, and αs1-casein genes and their association with reproductive performance in dromedary she-camels. Theriogenol. 2022; 178: 18–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.11.001.
3. Anzures-Olvera F, Véliz FG, De Santiago A, García JE, Mellado J, Macías-Cruz U, Avendaño-Reyes L, Mellado M. The impact of hair coat color on physiological variables, reproductive performance and milk yield of Holstein cows in a hot environment. J Thermal Biol. 2019; 81: 82–88. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2019.02.020.
4. Brandão AP, Cooke RF. Effects of temperament on the reproduction of beef cattle. Animals. 2021; 11 (11): 3325. DOI: 10.3390/ani11113325.
5. Bragança LG, Zangirolamo AF. Strategies for increasing fertility in high productivity dairy herds. Anim Reprod. 2018; 15 (3): 256–260. DOI: 10.21451/1984-3143-AR2018-0079.
6. Britt JH, Cushman RA, Dechow CD, Dobson H, Humblot P, Hutjens MF, Jones GA, Mitloehner FM, Ruegg PL, Sheldon IM, Stevenson JS. Review: Perspective on high-performing dairy cows and herds. Animal. 2021; 15 (S1): 100298. DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100298.
7. Burgers EEA, Kok A, Goselink RMA, Hogeveen H, Kemp B, Van Knegsel ATM. Fertility and milk production on commercial dairy farms with customized lactation lengths. J Dairy Sci. 2021; 104 (1): 443–458. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2019-17947.
8. Cai Z, Guldbrandtsen B, Lund MS, Sahana G. Prioritizing candidate genes for fertility in dairy cows using gene-based analysis, functional annotation and differential gene expression. BMC Genom. 2019; 20: 255. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-5638-9.
9. De Vries A, Marcondes MI. Review: Overview of factors affecting productive lifespan of dairy cows. Animal. 2020; 14 (S1): s155–s164. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731119003264.
10. Diavão J, Silva AS, Sguizzato ALL, Silva CS, Tomich TR, Pereira LGR. How does reproduction account for dairy farm sustainability? Anim Reprod. 2023; 20 (2): e20230066. DOI: 10.1590/1984-3143-ar2023-0066.
11. Eisner FF. Breeding Work with Dairy Cattle. Moscow, Agropromizdat, 1986: 184 p.
12. Eisner FF. Use of Breeding Traits in Cattle Breeding. Kyiv, Urozhai, 1976: 23–24.
13. Fernandez-Novo A, Pérez-Garnelo SS, Villagrá A, Pérez-Villalobos N, Astiz S. The effect of stress on reproduction and reproductive technologies in beef cattle — A review. Animals. 2020; 10 (11): 2096. DOI: 10.3390/ani10112096.
14. Gauly M, Ammer S. Review: Challenges for dairy cow production systems arising from climate changes. Animal. 2020; 14 (S1): s196-s203. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731119003239.
15. Gill M, Karatieieva O, Tymofiiv M. Biotechnology of regulation of reproductive functions of Bos primigenius taurus. Ukr Black Sea Region Agr Sci. 2023; 4 (27): 36–51. DOI: 10.56407/bs.agrarian/4.2023.36.
16. Gritsienko Y, Karatieieva O, Gill M. Identification of some genetic markers as productive and reproductive traits in Ukrainian dairy cattle breeding. Online J Anim Feed Res. 2024; 14 (2):124–136. DOI: 10.51227/ojafr.2024.15.
17. Gorelik OV, Brjanzev AY, Safronov SL, Gritsenko SA, Bobkova E. Influence of the age of cows on the dynamics of dairy efficiency depending on a breeding line. IOP Conf Series: Earth Environ Sci. 2021; 677 (4): 042015. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/677/4/042015.
18. Gorelik OV, Lihodeevskaya OE, Zezin NN, Sevostyanov MY, Leshonok OI. Assessment of the effect of inbreeding on the productive longevity of dairy cattle. IOP Conf Series: Earth Environ Sci. 2020; 548 (8): 082009. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/548/8/082009.
19. Hansen PJ. Prospects for gene introgression or gene editing as a strategy for reduction of the impact of heat stress on production and reproduction in cattle. Theriogenol. 2020; 154: 190–202. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.05.010.
20. Hufana-Duran D, Duran PG. Animal reproduction strategies for sustainable livestock production in the tropics. IOP Conf Series: Earth Environ Sci. 2020; 492 (1): 012065. IOP Publishing. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/492/1/012065.
21. Karatieieva E, Galushko I, Kravchenko E, Gill M. Use of entropic and information analysis of living weight of dairy cows for productivity. Sci Papers Ser D Anim Sci. 2021; 64 (2): 58–63. Available at: https://dspace.mnau.edu.ua/jspui/bitstream/123456789/11471/1/Art7.pdf
22. Keogh K, Carthy TR, McClure MC, Waters SM, Kenny DA. Genome-wide association study of economically important traits in Charolais and Limousin beef cows. Animal. 2021; 15 (1): 100011. DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100011.
23. Mastromonaco GF, Gonzalez-Grajales AL. Reproduction in female wild cattle: Influence of seasonality on ARTs. Theriogenol. 2020; 150: 396–404. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogeno2020.02.016.
24. Mello RRC, Sinedino LDP, Ferreira JE, de Sousa SLG, de Mello MRB. Principal component and cluster analyses of production and fertility traits in Red Sindhi dairy cattle breed in Brazil. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2020; 52: 273–281. DOI: 10.1007/s11250-019-02009-7.
25. Menta PR, Machado VS, Piñeiro JM, Thatcher WW, Santos JEP, Vieira-Neto A. Heat stress during the transition period is associated with impaired production, reproduction, and survival in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2022; 105 (5): 4474–4489. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2021-21185.
26. Miroshnychenko KS. The world market of dairy products. Kharchoprom of Ukraine. 2013; 18 (226): 13–17. (in Ukrainian)
27. Nzeyimana JB, Fan C, Zhuo Z, Butore J, Cheng J. Heat stress effects on the lactation performance, reproduction, and alleviating nutritional strategies in dairy cattle, a review. J Anim Behav Biometeorol. 2023; 11 (3): e2023018. DOI: 10.31893/jabb.23018.
28. Polevyi VL, Bryzhatiy BM. The number of cows of the breeding nucleus and their productivity. Coll Sci Papers VNAU. 2012; 60 (2): 129–131. (in Ukrainian)
29. Prylipko TM, Kostash VB, Koval TV. Alimentary Improvement of the Reproductive Function of Cattle. A monograph. Kamianets-Podilskyi, Vit’ADruk, 2022: 390 p. Available at: http://188.190.43.194:7980/jspui/handle/123456789/10288
30. Ringa-Ošleja G, Antāne V, Lūsis I, Grantiņa-Ieviņa L, Šteingolde Ž, Mališevs A, Bērziņš A. Reproduction and productivity in dairy cattle after abortions both related and unrelated to Coxiella burnetii. Animals. 2023; 13 (22): 3561. DOI: 10.3390/ani13223561.
31. Sakatani M. [The role of reproductive biology in SDGs] Global warming and cattle reproduction: Will increase in cattle numbers progress to global warming? J Reprod Dev. 2022; 68 (2): 90–95. DOI: 10.1262/jrd.2021-149.
32. Sehested J, Gaillard C, Lehmann JO, Maciel GM, Vestergaard M, Weisbjerg MR, Mogensen L, Larsen LB, Poulsen NA, Kristensen T. Extended lactation in dairy cattle. Animal. 2019; 13 (S1): s65-s74. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731119000806.
33. Strandén I, Kantanen J, Russo IRM, Orozco-terWengel P, Bruford MW, Climgen Consortium. Genomic selection strategies for breeding adaptation and production in dairy cattle under climate change. Heredity. 2019; 123 (3): 307–317. DOI: 10.1038/s41437-019-0207-1.
34. Tadesse B, Reda AA, Kassaw NT, Tadeg W. Success rate of artificial insemination, reproductive performance and economic impact of failure of first service insemination: a retrospective study. BMC Vet Res. 2022; 18 (1): 226. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-022-03325-1.
35. Valldecabres A, Branco-Lopes R, Bernal-Córdoba C, Silva-del-Río N. Production and reproduction responses for dairy cattle supplemented with oral calcium bolus after calving: Systematic review and meta-analysis. JDS Commun. 2023; 4 (1): 9–13. DOI: 10.3168/jdsc.2022-0235.
36. Vasylchak SV, Zhidyak OR. Production of milk and prospect of its development. Sci Bull UNFU. 2009; 19 (1): 99–106. Available at: https://nv.nltu.edu.ua/Archive/2009/19_1/99_Wasylczak_19_1.pdf
37. Vinnychuk DT, Merezhko PM. Ways of creating a highly productive herd. Kyiv, Urozhai. 1993: 152 p. (in Ukrainian)
38. Vsyakikh A. S. Methods of Accelerating the Breeding of Dairy Cattle. Moscow, Agropromizdat, 1990: 192 p.
39. Yanga DS, Jaja IF. Culling and mortality of dairy cows: why it happens and how it can be mitigated. F1000Research. 2021; 10: 1014. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.55519.2.
40. Yangibayevich AA, Pardaboev A, Absalomovich NB. Issues of modeling the perspective development of cattle breeding. South As J Mark Managem Res. 2020; 10 (6): 89–96. DOI: 10.5958/2249-877X.2020.00044.2.
41. Zachut M, Šperanda M, De Almeida AM, Gabai G, Mobasheri A, Hernández-Castellano LE. Biomarkers of fitness and welfare in dairy cattle: healthy productivity. J Dairy Res. 2020; 87 (1): 4–13. DOI: 10.1017/S0022029920000084.
42. Zhang H, Sammad A, Shi R, Dong Y, Zhao S, Liu L, Guo G, Xu Q, Liu A, Wang Y. Genetic polymorphism and mRNA expression studies reveal IL6R and LEPR gene associations with reproductive traits in Chinese Holsteins. Agriculture. 2023; 13 (2): 321. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture13020321.
43. Zubets MV, Burkat VP, Polupan YP. State and prospects of breed formation in dairy cattle breeding of the south of Ukraine. Sci Bull NAU. 2000; 41: 21–23.