Download full text in PDF

Bìol. Tvarin. 2023; 25 (3): 31–35.
https://doi.org/10.15407/animbiol25.03.031
Received 15.07.2023 ▪ Revision 13.08.2023 ▪ Accepted 25.09.2023 ▪ Published online 02.10.2023

---

Reproductive dynamics of the common toad (Bufo bufo) and the grass frog (Rana temporaria) as one of the key species of their seasonal cycle

B. O. Andriishyn

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

National Research and Development Restoration Center of Ukraine (Lviv branch), 10 Lesi Ukrainky str., Lviv, 79008, Ukraine

---

The results of research on the reproductive dynamics of the key amphibian species of the Ukrainian Roztochchia are presented. Since reproduction is one of the most important and key stages of the seasonal cycle of amphibians, special attention was paid to this period. We used classic and typical methods of recording reproductive activity of amphibians: route records, searching for dead amphibians on the roads, vocalization methods and installation of temporary protective barriers that prevent amphibians from crossing the road. Therefore, amphibians of the genera Rana and Bufo belong to the species with a sudden type of reproduction. We included representatives of the genera Lissotriton, Triturus, Bombina, Hyla, and Pelophylax to the long-term breeding species. In particular, temporary protective barriers gave us indicative and clear concepts regarding the temporal peaks and troughs of reproductive migrations of the studied amphibian species, as well as the direction of movement to reproductive and trophic habitats. Comparing the beginning of reproductive activity and its course throughout the season, we can see certain differences between the model species B. bufo and R. temporaria, in particular, the choice of breeding ponds, the time of spawning and the period of activity of sexually active individuals. Reproductive activity of the common frog occurs in the first half of March — mid-April. In the second half of April, we caught common frogs on both sides of the barriers, which indicates a “turning point” in the sexual activity of this species. Although the common toad is the first to appear after hibernation, spawning occurs approximately a decade later than that of the common frog but takes a little longer. We believe that such research should be continued regularly and our results will encourage herpetologists to further and long-term research.

Key words: seasonal cycle, amphibians, Ukrainian Roztochchia, reproductive dynamics, reproduction

---

1. Davies NB, Halliday TR. Competitive mate searching in male common toads, Bufo bufo. Behav. 1979; 27 (4): 1253–1267. DOI: 10.1016/0003-3472(79)90070-8.
2. Elmberg J, Lundberg P. Intraspecific variation in calling, time allocation and energy reserves in breeding male common frogs Rana temporaria. Zool. Fennici. 1991; 28 (1): 23–29. Available at: https://www.sekj.org/PDF/anzf28/anz28-023-029.pdf
3. Elmberg J. Long-term survival, length of breeding season, and operational sex ratio in a boreal population of common frogs, Rana temporaria Canad. J. Zool. 1990; 68 (1): 121–127. DOI: 10.1139/z90-017.
4. Gittins SP, Parker AG, Slater FM. Mate assortment in the common toad (Bufo bufo). Nat. Hist. 1980: 14 (5): 663–668. DOI: 10.1080/00222938000770561.
5. Hartel T, Demeter L. The breeding migration and population characteristics of a common toad (Bufo bufo, Linnaeus 1758) population visiting a seminatural pond in Sighişoara. Rev. Syst. Ecol. Res. 2005; 2: 145–154. Available at: https://magazines.ulbsibiu.ro/trser/trser2/145-154.pdf
6. Hartel T. The long-term trend and the distribution of amphibian populations in a semi-natural pond in the middle section of the Târnava-Mare Valley (Romania). Biota. 2004; 5 (1): 25–36.
7. Loman J, Madsen T. Reproductive tactics of large and small male toads Bufo bufo. Oikos. 1986; 46 (1): 57–61. DOI: 10.2307/3565380.
8. Reading CJ. Interspecific spawning between common frogs (Rana temporaria) and common toads (Bufo bufo). Zool. 1984; 203 (1): 95–101. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1984.tb06046.x.
9. Reading CJ. Non-random pairing with respect to past breeding experience in the common toad (Bufo bufo). Zool. 2001; 255 (4): 511–518. DOI: 10.1017/S0952836901001595.
10. Reshetylo O, Rizun E, Rizun V. The problem of amphibian mortality on highways and ways to solve it. Visnyk Lviv Univ. Biol. Ser. 2006; 42: 70–78.
11. Strömberg G. The yearly cycle of the jumping frog (Rana dalmatina) in Sweden. A 12-year study. In: Llorente GA. Scientia Herpetologica. Asociacion Herpetologica Española, 1995: 185–186. ISBN 84-605-3526-6.
12. Tada D., Martino A, Sinsch U. Release vocalizations in neotropical toads (Bufo): ecological constraints and phylogenetic implications. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 2001; 39 (1–2): 13–23. DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0469.2001.00147.x.
13. Van Gelder JJ, Hoedemaekers HCM. Sound activity and migration during the breeding period of Rana temporaria, R. arvalis Nilsson, Pelobates fuscus Laur. and Rana esculenta L. J. Anim. Ecol. 1971; 40 (3): 559–568. DOI: 10.2307/3437.
14. Wells KD. Territoriality and male mating success in the green frog (Rana clamitans). Ecology. 1977; 58 (4): 750–762. DOI: 10.2307/1936211.
15. Wells KD. The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. Behav. 1977; 25 (3): 666–693. DOI: 10.1016/0003-3472(77)90118-X.